| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Meetings

Page history last edited by Kelly Behrend 15 years, 9 months ago

Bonner Program Operations

Meetings


All-Bonner Group Meetings | Reflection Meetings | Site-Based Team Meetings | Resource Documents

 
Regular meetings are a key part of the communication, enrichment, and training for Bonner Scholars. Meetings can range from two people planning a project to the entire Bonner family attending a training session led by an outside facilitator. Although special projects will require special meetings, a program the size of the Bonner Scholars Program should have standard meeting times and places set for effective operation of the Program.
 
In addition to the required regular meetings of Bonner Scholars described below, Bonner Directors are encouraged to meet one-on-one with Bonner Scholars at least once each semester and more often for those students who are having academic or personal difficulties.
 

All-Bonner Group Meetings

Regular meetings should be organized for (and by) Bonner Scholars for education, training, and enrichment purposes. Effective Bonner Scholars meetings can be characterized by the following six attributes:
  • Participants have a strong sense of belonging or unity. The Bonner Scholars are the central players in the meeting, so they should know that they belong there. There is a sense of mission and cooperation. Scholars want to be a part of the group and see a common purpose. In essence, there is a strong commitment and loyalty to the group, which translates into good attendance at each session, prepared and informed members, and a willingness to work hard for the group and for self.
  • Everybody participates. In a good meeting, everyone feels comfortable contributing. There is a shared interaction among members. Regardless of actual status or position, each Scholar feels that all remarks will be considered by the rest of the group. No one dominates or monopolizes the discussion.
  • Discussion follows a clear plan. Effective meetings have clear purposes, published agendas, and prepared members who stick to the purpose and stay on course. Everyone knows why the meeting was called, what the group is trying to accomplish, and where it stands in relation to the task. Keeping the discussion on the subject allows for efficient use of time.
  • Conflicts are managed. Whenever we meet in groups to give or share information, make decisions, generate ideas, or solve problems, differences of opinion will occur. When meetings are operating properly, we will feel free to disagree. Organizations that stifle conflict restrict the good ideas collegial bickering or friction can produce and the learning that is inevitable. On the other hand, meetings must not deteriorate into aggressive free-for-alls. In effective meetings, people can disagree while maintaining respect for one another.
  • Task and people issues are considered. In effective meetings, the group does its work while maintaining good relationships between the people involved. Both the task and the morale of the group are important considerations. A group that is all work and no play will quickly burn out. Nor should a meeting be all fun and games and no work. The more that people like coming to meetings, the more productive the meetings can be. Meeting effectiveness is a combination of productivity and enjoyment.
  • The group is aware of its process. Effective groups have ways to examine themselves and their progress. At times, they step back from their job and look at their procedures, membership, and internal communication. Members can suggest alternative meeting times, propose new ways of operating, and comment on group problems. This is the only way that a group can solve its functional problems. By monitoring the group process, members can make sure meetings are purposeful, organized, enjoyable, and productive.
 

Reflection Meetings

Henry David Thoreau once said, “It is not enough to be busy, so are the ants. The question is, ‘What are we busy about?’ ” Reflection is a critical process of learning derived from questioning, examining, and analyzing events and experiences. It is the time we spend thinking, evaluating, and assessing the work that we do, what it means, and how it affects us and the world. By practicing critical reflection, we begin to deepen our understanding of the issues, make connections, gain new skills, and become more effective in our work.
Commonly thought of as an inward, passive process, reflection can be dynamic when paired with service, becoming very much an outward, active process. Values exploration, sharing fears and successes, and recognizing the connection between individual efforts and those of other groups, cities, nations, and cultures are all elements of reflection that draw on the community service experience, transforming it into a learning opportunity.
 
Students may be encouraged to reflect through:
  • Journals, particularly enhanced through definition and explanation of the process as it may apply to Bonner Scholars’ reflections:
    • Specify how many entries per week and the maximum length of each, usually no more than a page per entry;
    • Assure writers of the confidential nature of the journal, and do not violate that confidence; always get writer’s permission before you quote or even obliquely refer to an entry;
    • Use the journal information, not as a means of evaluating or judging the writer, but ofexamining their experience;
    • Leave the writer’s grammar or spelling alone;
    • Make brief, cogent, written remarks/questions in response to journals;
    • Receive and return journals promptly according to a pre-set schedule;
    • Encourage students to understand the difference between observation and interpretation and have them separate the two components in each entry;
    • Periodically pose a provocative statement or question to which you want students to respond in a journal entry;
    • Allow some room for students to express to you, via their journals, what’s going on inside them (not necessarily related to the Bonner Scholars Program);
    • When it seems appropriate, invite (but don’t require) the writer to talk with you about something in the journal (the “distance” and “facelessness” of written communication may need to continue for a long time before a face-to-face conversation can be comfortable or productive).
  • Selected brief readings, copied and distributed to students for reading prior to discussion;
  • Periodic opportunities for students to verbalize for each other, collectively or in small groups, what they are learning, their questions, etc. as related to their service experiences.
 

Site-Based Team Meetings

Bonner students and other student leaders on campus are often organized into site-based teams for popular service placements.
 

Resource Documents

 


Previous Page: Allocation of Bonner Scholarship Funds | Next Page: Communication


Back to Director's Handbook Index.

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.